Behavior and Perestroika
نویسنده
چکیده
The field of behavior analysis progressively has expanded its horizons. In the 1930s and 40s, it focused on molecular responses of birds and small mammals. The 1950s and 60s witnessed an expansion to consideration of primate behavior, including that of humans. The 1970s and 80s experienced the behavioral community psychology emphasis, which investigated behavior and its controlling contingencies within the context of the social network that characterizes· communities. As the 1990s begin, behavior analysis has matured to the point where it can go beyond Skinner's early discussions of large scale social processes (1953, 1971), and consider, in increasingly sophisticated manners, the contingencies that societies impose on their members and the functional relationship of these contingencies to the behavior of their constituents. The interest in behavior analysis on a societal level has been manifested in two directions. Some writers have developed cogent theoretical perspectives and general analyses. Malagodi (1986), Malott (1988), Segal (1987), and Glenn (1986, 1988) exemplify this focus. Glenn, in particular, has been working systematically to integrate behavioral theory with cultural materialism, an anthropological perspective developed by Harris (1979). Other writers, observing the aetna! developments in the world, have been drawn to the widespread social, political, and economic modif"tcations that have been implemented by various socialist countries. Lama!, for example, analyzed the contingencies extant in China (1984) and I have focused on Hungary (Rakos, 1988a) and on socialism in general (Rakos, 1988b, 1989, in press), prompting lively debate with Uhnan (1988, 1989). The two articles -in this section continue this latter emphasis by presenting behavior analyses of -~oviet society before, and then under, the perestroika (economic restructuring) that was implemented in the mid 1980s. Mikhail Gorbachev's foreign and domestic policy initiatives have captured the imagination and admiration of statesmen and women, and of ordinary citizens, throughout the world. The Soviet Union is, of course, the most important socialist player in global political and economic manuevers, though China will no doubt
منابع مشابه
The Hazards of Half-measures: Perestroika and the Failure of Post-Soviet Democratization
Perestroika was the most dramatic chapter in the political history of the world in the late twentieth century. Yet, it did not fulfill what was arguably its loftiest promise—to lay firm foundations for lasting popular rule in Russia. The failure of democratization in post-Soviet Russia may be traced in part to two fateful shortcomings in perestroika: the tepidity of Gorbachev’s economic reforms...
متن کاملPerestroika in the Soviet Union's health system.
Recent experiments in the Soviet Union mirror the debates in the United Kingdom about improving incentives in health care. The most interesting innovation to emerge under perestroika is a pilot project in Leningrad and at two other sites which could radically change the financing of hospitals. Hitherto, the budget has gone from the ministry to the hospitals and to the polyclinics by bureaucrati...
متن کامل"perestroika" on Wall Street: the Future of Securities Trading
*The views expressed herein are those of Commissioner Grundfest and do not necessarily represent those of the Commission, other Commissioners, or the Commission's staff. This material is based on a transcript of extemporaneous remarks.
متن کاملPerestroika and the Challenge of Democracy in Russia
The period since the onset of perestroika is examined as a single process in which a number of fundamental metapolitical factors are identified. These processes transcend the specific personalities of Gorbachev,Yeltsin, and Putin, yet shape and constrain their leaderships. Path dependency is important, but cannot be entirely determining. Postcommunist restorationism shares some features with ea...
متن کاملAlex Mogilner: Math illuminates biology
S ometimes, genetic maps and laboratory experiments cannot provide scientists with enough information to understand a complicated biological problem. At other times, a researcher may have a plausible explanation for some process but no practical way to validate these ideas in an animal or cell culture. These are just some of the scenarios when mathematical modeling offers biologists a precious ...
متن کامل